--- In [email protected], "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Seraphita" <s3raphita@> wrote:
> >
> > Fergie! Don't get me started! When you think of the virtually unlimited
> > choice a true-blue royal has over a life partner they sure do pick 'em.
> > About Diana, there's also the ticklish aspect that she was sleeping with
> > Arabs and Indians. We are talking about the succession to the Throne
> > here and there were rumours she was pregnant when she died. One has to
> > wonder if there was an unpleasant racist element to the irritation she
> > sparked in the Establishment of the day.
> 
> Oh no, we can't have anyone pollute the succession to the throne
> with vile foreign genes. Much better to have another inbred
> chinless wonder sucking off the civil teat for it's entire life.
> 
> Talking of bringing the "royal" family into disrepute, how do
> you feel about princes Charles and Andy meeting with ministers
> to make sure they don't introduce laws that might interfere with
> their private business interests, that they don't pay tax on?
> 
> Sack the fucking lot of them, I'm amazed that this country is so
> backwards we still need a "royal" family to pour money over just
> so the lame can get all dewy eyed about "real" princesses. The 
> D&D of Cambridge have just moved into their first home of many, 
> a 10 bed Georgian mansion (not including staff quarters obviously)
> in return he'll smile like his Mum used to and she might open the
> occasional supermarket. Nice work if you can get it.
> 
> Vive le revolution!

Oh Geez, no one mention the "Family" or the "R" word to Salyavin, it really 
gets him going!
> 
> 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "Ann"  wrote:
> > 
> > > > >
> > > > It's dirty work but someone has to do it. Diana was snorting coke,
> > > > sleeping around with whoever took her fancy and generally bringing
> > the
> > > > Royal Family into disrepute.
> > >
> > > If they killed Diana for that then should have hung, drawn and
> > quartered Fergie (the Duchess of York). I don't buy it. Diana wasn't
> > important enough to kill. Look at the behaviour of the English monarchy
> > over the last 900 years and she was the least of their problems.
> > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to