Judy, this is just me having fun, playing. But continue taking all this way too seriously as long as you want.
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:46 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: And Share shows us yet another step in her Avoidance Dance. ---In [email protected], <sharelong60@...> wrote: Shoulda coulda woulda... On Sunday, November 17, 2013 12:41 PM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> wrote: You mean, you could have refrained from asking? Perhaps you should have, because it was a really dumb question. Share muddled: > Judy, what makes you think I felt that I had to ask? On Sunday, November 17, 2013 12:25 PM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> wrote: Then who did, such that you felt you had to ask how her comment was pro-Amma? You seem to be having a harder time than usual making sense of the posts today. Maybe it's the full moon, eh? Share faltered: > Judy, I don't believe I said that you said, did I? On Sunday, November 17, 2013 11:57 AM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> wrote: I don't believe I said her comment was pro-Amma, Share, did I? Share bobbled: > Judy, how is Louise's comment about indiff's style being pro Amma?! ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>Oh, great, now the pro-Amma folks are coming here to carry on their fight. >>>>Just what we needed. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>---In [email protected], <slouisedavis@...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I don't think people should encourage indifferent. He is quite abusive. I >>>>>am surprised threats are allowed here. >>>>>Louise >>>>> >>>>>
