Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: for Emily & Bob, to thank Richard, Share finally replies about Ann's tree photo

[bobpriced]

 

---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, <punditster@...> wrote:

 Are you suggesting that Emily was dishonest and sneaky about leaving out the 
part where you said that her tree and photo were lovely. Should she get booted 
for that? Where's Judy when we need her?
 

 Richard Macro (#5):
 

 Have you thrown that load of laundry in yet (Rita is waiting)?
 
 On 12/20/2013 9:36 AM, Share Long wrote:
 
   See, Emily, imo your post is a form of dishonesty because you leave out the 
part where I say the tree and photo are lovely. And it's sneaky dishonesty to 
boot.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On Friday, December 20, 2013 8:53 AM, "emilymaenot@..." mailto:emilymaenot@... 
<emilymaenot@...> mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
 
   Re: I shall now enlighten you both about my immediate and mundane reaction 
to the photo of her Christmas tree that Ann posted. Hold onto your seatbelts!  
"Huh?! But wait a minute! I've seen this photo before! Is this the same photo 
Ann posted last year?!"
 
 
 Yes, Barry is correct.  Share definitely exhibits "range and an ability to 
feel positive emotion." I'm all teared up with this warm and fuzzy response.