Right, the context was Share's preference for punjabis over saris: "Plus they are practical, meaning one could still flee or er apply one's knee to a feller's nether regions if he got too frisky. So punjabis I'm guessing are great for setting boundaries if one is about to experience PhysR rather than PsyR or EmoR. I'm just sayin." (That's a reference, BTW, to her having accused Robin of "psychological rape," another very ugly story involving Share.) IOW, "got too frisky" here refers to attempted rape.
Curtis was confused, thinking she was referring to Fairfield. She corrected him: "Oh, I meant the women in India. From recent news reports there seems to be a lot of hyper frisky fellers there." She was referring to an NPR story Buck had linked to about the terrible problems India was having with rape (including murderous rape--one of the recent victims was 4 years old). She later claimed calling the Indian rapists "frisky fellers" had been a "joke." I kid you not, folks. This is what Steve is trying to defend her from. The NPR story is here: http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175471907/on-indias-trains-seeking-safety-in-the-women-s-compartment I can give you links to any of the posts I quoted. (I can also refer you to one of the very ugliest posts I've ever seen on FFL. It's from Curtis, also attempting to defend Share, and it's truly sickening. Only someone with a disturbed mind could have written it.) Steve wrote: Exactly Share. Most everyone knew the context in which you made your comment. And only those with the most nefarious intent would choose to interpret it in the way they do. Why don't you tell us what your interpretation was, Steve? I've given you the context; go to it. Quite a shame that people choose to do that.
