--- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Judy:
> > > > > It's what males *do*, and thank goodness.  If they
> > > > > didn't, the species wouldn't survive for long.  It's
> > > > > just funny and charming to see it in this context.
> > > >  
> > > > > I could be wrong, of course, but I got a chuckle
> > > > > out of the image.  Sorry it pushed your buttons.
> 
> Rory:
> > > > It's a nice image, but perhaps a little off in this case. 
I've 
> seldom been reticent to share my current understandings, 
> regardless of who may or may not eventually enjoy them. These have
> been  percolating since just before the Navaratri/Durga puja last 
>  week crystallized further over the past few days, and finally 
> coalesced  enough to (attempt to) communicate :-)
> 
> Judy: 
> > > I'll take your word for it.  But there seemed to me to
> > > be a sort of competition going on as to who could write
> > > the most elaborate and flowery description.  
> 
> Akasha:
> And its [thess posts] useful, how?
> 
> Rory:
> Helps me understand myself. 
> 
> -----
> I share Rory's perspective and motivation on this. Why people post 
is
> interesting to ponder -- I ask myself at times. What happens with 
me
> is that I may read a post and it strikes an interesting thought [to
> me]. The post I am reading may or may not be interesting [to me]. 
But
> posting a reply gives an opportunity to work out and examine the 
idea
> that arises. I try to tie it to the invoking posters post. Or 
state I
> am using theirs only as a springboard to explore a new vista.
> 
> Why not just post to a journal? Well that would work too. But it
> doesn't give the stimulus of other posts. And, occasionally, a post
> exploring some new idea, may actually invoke an interesting 
diologue.
>  Not often. But it happens. Thus the impetus to keep throwing stuff
> out there. 
> 
> As far as others, I assume few read what I write. I am not writing 
to
> seek approval or recognition, Actually slams are good, in that it
> makes me revaluate things, both message and strength of conviction.
> For example if someone slams the post and its due to not getting my
> point, I consider how to refine my writing. When a poster gets it, 
but
> disagrees, its a good check on ideas and of how strongly 
I "beleive"
> what I wrote.
> 
> And its interesting to "people watch". To see the disparity between
> words and actions, at times. To see various motives at work
> (apparently -- though motives of others is always speculative).
> 
> And its interesting to see a number of minds at work, including
> Akaasha's, and see what pops up, not necessarily taking any of the
> bubbles of the collective minds as right or wrong, better or worse.
>
Well said! ...and I for one read many of your posts, except I 
confess some of the really, really, really long ones. And yes, 
I 'journaled' for many years, but it is a much richer experience to 
do it here, good, bad or indifferent...





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to