If you read the post you quote, you know I did have such comments. As I also pointed out, there are only occasional transliterations of Sanskrit terms here and there in the commentary of Maharishi's Gita version. It provides the text of the Gita in Devanagari and then in English translation, not "transliteration." Maharishi didn't need Katz to supply a "transliteration" of the Gita, as you incorrectly claimed.
"Transliteration" is the wrong term. Do you have any comments to make concerning MMY's version of the Gita or if it was "distorted" or written by Vernon Katz? The original script is of the Gita was Devangiri which was transliterated into the Latin script. Transliteration is the conversion of a text from one script to another. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transliteration http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transliteration
