This one is quite good too: I tried it. Got it bought for me as a gift. Yeah it did feel good the first couple of times, but no better than breathing exercises I've done before. Everyone there seemed to gob the nonsense that goes with it about thought bubbles and the absolute base of human thought. What a load of wishy washy nonsense made up by a man with a mind for making cash. Apart from the lack of institutional infiltration, it's all very L Ron Hubbard. I'd like to see a truly scientific comparison of TM versus breathing excersises with placebo.
-------------------------------------------- On Mon, 3/3/14, Michael Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Funny article from the Guardian Newspaper about TM To: [email protected] Date: Monday, March 3, 2014, 4:43 PM I like this comment better: formersufferer I did TM for eleven years 30 years back and finished up with a severe type of epilepsy whereby I would have fits lasting up to five hours, and I became very unstable and unbalanced. I gave it up and was involved in a TV programme exposing it, called Credo. Prof Peter Fenwick of the Maudesley Psychiatric Hospital did some research which he reported on the programme. He explained that the EEG waves of a person practising TM and those of someone having an epileptic fit are identical. There has been quite a lot of research showing how damaging TM is but the TM people have a lot of money which enables them to override the truth. TM IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS IN THE LONG TERM DESPITE APPEARING TO BE RELAXING in the short term. Some shots of whisky might have a similar effect -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 3/3/14, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Funny article from the Guardian Newspaper about TM To: [email protected] Date: Monday, March 3, 2014, 4:37 PM ---In [email protected], <s3raphita@...> wrote: One comment I appreciate is this one from Denis Postle:"I've been doing TM off and on for decades. A key thing to appreciate about it is that it is a reliable way of taking us to the hypnogogic and hypnopompic junctions between sleep and awake and keeping us hovering there. With very tangible results . . . " David Lynch says something similar in his book Catching the Big Fish. To those who wonder what "transcending" is like, Lynch says that everyone has already experienced it. When you're lying in bed at night waiting for sleep to come you occasionally have a sudden sinking feeling as your awareness dips towards unconsciousness. It feels rather disconcerting and actually jolts you awake. Lynch claims that TM is essentially training you to bounce around at that level as a regular routine. Ramana Maharshi recommended his followers to try a similar practice: when waking up in the morning keep your consciousness at the point where you've just emerged from sleep into conscious awareness but *before* any thinking kicks in. Maharshi claimed that learning to balance yourself at this razor's edge would enable you to see the true nature of the Self. Anyone want to claim Denis, Lynch and Maharshi are talking nonsense? Funny you should ask that because while reading their assertion it simply did not resonate with my experience. The transition between waking and sleeping is not transcendence in my book. It is full of thoughts and awareness that do not feel transcendental at all. But I have zero other evidence than my subjectivity and gut feeling to back this up.
