Michael, imo, nothing and no one in this world is either 100% bad or 100% good. 
So on that level I disagree with you. Moreover, I think TM and TMSP continue to 
relieve suffering and help many people develop fully as human beings. And I 
don't think that development and full development are going to look the same 
way for every person. To expect that is, I think, to again engage in black and 
white thinking.    


On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 8:25 AM, Michael Jackson <mjackso...@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
  
Given the fact that the TMO is an organization that lives off lies, gets 
everyone else to fund them so the leadership doesn't actually have to have real 
jobs - in other words they are living parasitically off the rank and file 
TM'ers - the fact that they live off of and perpetuate many blatant lies such 
as don't expose yourself to full solar eclipse cuz the demons and bad karma 
will get you, if you live in a non-Marshy Vastu home, you will have all kinds 
of problems and the fact that much of their inner level marketing (meaning 
their marketing to True Believers on the inner levels of the Movement) is done 
through fear mongering (telling you all the bad stuff that is gone happen if 
you don't do as they say, live as they tell you to live and give them the money 
they are begging for) then yes I would have to say it has become 100% 
unpleasant and if you want to call it that, bad. 

What does the TMO actually DO for anyone except get you to accept bizarre 
beliefs and live a bizarre lifestyle and give them your money? What do they 
actually DO for people? ANYONE who has ever worked for the Movement can attest 
to these things - the TMO always gets paid, they never pay out. They routinely 
lie and manipulate people. If you are giving of your time, effort energy money 
to them, they love you, as long as you jump through their hoops, but when you 
can't, even through illness give to them any longer, they cut you loose and 
turn their backs on you. They focus ONLY on those who keep them up and give 
what they want. That alone is enough to show what kind of people run the damn 
organization and the fact that TM ain't no panacea. 
--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 4/1/14, Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Self Course Fairfield
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2014, 2:27 AM
















 









Michael,
when you make such extreme statements like the one about
finding virtue in the TMO "where none exists,"
then you lose me and, I would guess, anyone who was
beginning to believe you. Are you really saying that the TMO
is 100% without virtue?! Which implies that it's 100%
bad. Is this what you are saying?! 

On Monday, March 31,
2014 9:18 PM, "steve.sun...@yahoo.com"
<steve.sun...@yahoo.com> wrote:

 









You know
Michael, for someone who denigrates any scientific research
performed by the TMO, you sure have a way of trying to make
a case on a weak set of data. Well, let's be honest.
 No data.
I mean, on the one hand, you
state that most people who start, stop soon afterward, and
yet you say that the practice of TM can often be responsible
for people committing suicide. Do I have that
right?
Are you saying the long term
mediators are far more likely to commit suicide and have
emotional problems due to their practice of TM, and
participation in the TMO?
I wonder how you'd go about backing that
up?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
<mjackson74@...> wrote :

tell
that to all the long term meditators who have tried to
commit suicide - tell that to the family members of those
long term TM'ers who did commit suicide, tell that to
the people whose lives have been ruined by their adherence
to TM and messing around with the TMO - people who are
mental/emotional basket cases from years of TM. They do
exist. They are out there and I am willing to bet you know
some of them. It is true that TM doesn't hurt some
people, but to say that it is good for most is a flat out
lie.



The numbers have always been jimmied by the TMO and True
Believers. Most people who are initiated stop doing TM soon
after. 

--------------------------------------------

On Tue, 4/1/14, Share Long <sharelong60@...>
wrote:



Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Self Course Fairfield

To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>

Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2014, 1:24 AM

































 



















Steve, I

really appreciate how common sensical (is that a valid

phrase?) you are in what you say here. Especially the bit

about why the TMO changed its approach. And of course,
the

directly relevant part about twenty minutes meditating
being

good for most people. 



On Monday, March 31,

2014 7:08 PM, "steve.sundur@..."

<steve.sundur@...>
wrote:



 

























---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,

<steve.sundur@...> wrote :



Oh that's good Michael.

 At least a new name from the one I am usually
called.

 Or actually, you are comparing me to something,

rather than

declaring I am such and such.

At any rate, regarding this new approach, so what

if they are - distancing themselves from the Hindu roots?

Maybe they feel that has been off-putting for many
people,

and better to downplay it.

But as has been pointed out, that is nothing

different than has been done from the beginning.

 Maharishi started with a spiritual approach, and
then

shifted to a more scientific approach, because it would

appeal to more people.

You want to get people though the door.  You

want to get them to the introductory lecture.  You
want

to outline the benefits.

I happen to be able to observe some this new

approach up close, and it seems to be having some
results.

That and a lower fee for learning.

You are more comfortable making blanket (mostly

all negative) statements about the TMO and Maharishi. But

 like many endeavors, you can choose to participate
to

whatever degree you like.  Meditating for twenty

minutes twice a day, would, I think, be a healthy
activity

for most people.



---In

FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
<mjackson74@...> wrote

:



Come

on Steve, be real - you know damn good and well they are

distancing themselves from the Hindu roots and from

Maharishi himself - if you can't see how disingenuous

that is then you are a truly sheared TM sheep.



--------------------------------------------

On Mon, 3/31/14,

steve.sundur@...

<steve.sundur@...>

wrote:







Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Self Course Fairfield



To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com



Date: Monday, March 31, 2014, 2:55 PM



































































 







































You''ve always got it figured out Michael.



 Doesn't matter how many twists and turns you

have



to make, the conclusion is always the same.  So what

if



the TMO has adjusted their message, or their pitch?



 That's what organizations do.  Maybe the



problem you're having is that they seem to be having



some success.  Let's face it, that's wall

galls



you.  And really, I don't think you're

ashamed



to admit it.











---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,

<mjackson74@...>



wrote :







You are both



full of it - the TMO is attempting to tap into a new tier

of



customers and they are doing it in part to distance



themselves from the Old Goat because they know he has

become



a liability. I know what you are saying, as to M's



references to the Self, but they have never done an ad



campaign like this - everything they do is a calculated

move



to gain adherents, money and like the idiots they are,



create a "vedic" society. 







--------------------------------------------



On Mon, 3/31/14, steve.sundur@...



<steve.sundur@...>



wrote:















Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Self Course Fairfield







To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com







Date: Monday, March 31, 2014, 12:19 PM







































































































































 















































































Now that was







a "good catch" Judy.























---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,



<authfriend@...>







wrote :















Er, Michael,







more likely the New Age got "It's all the







Self" from TM. The Self has always been a TM thing.







It's what you're said to experience when you







transcend, remember? Boy, you are really out in







left field here.















---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,



<mjackson74@...>







wrote :















Oh







my God! Its happening - pulling away from its Hindu and



then







"it's all science" roots and tapping into

the







vague New Age ""it's all the Self"







hoodoo! These TM'ers are SHAMELESS in selling the







nostrums.















--------------------------------------------







On Mon, 3/31/14,







nablusoss1008 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>







wrote:































Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Self Course Fairfield















To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com















Date: Monday, March 31, 2014, 9:18 AM























http://www.experiencetheself.org/



































Reply via email to