"If scientists found as you hope, wuldn't that imply that everyone who
 ever learned TM was not just wasting their time, but was putting themselves at 
risk?"

I already know that, but it would be nice to have science confirm it. Yee haaa! 
As to my hopes they are based in personal experience and reality, not vacuous 
meanderings of the emotions where one hopes to wake up tomorrow in a sthapatya 
veda version of a Norman Rockwell painting.
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 4/9/14, lengli...@cox.net <lengli...@cox.net> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Unstressing or Demons?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Wednesday, April 9, 2014, 12:20 A
       
 You hope all of the
 below, eh?
 If scientists
 found as you hope, wuldn't that imply that everyone who
 ever learned TM was not just wasting their time, but was
 putting themselves at risk?
 Wouldn't
 a healthier hope be that scientists objectively examine
 TM's effects in independently done studies, and
 determine which, if any claims were correct, and which were
 actually counter to reality, whatever that turns out to
 mean?
 An even nicer
 hope would be that scientists would independently evaluate
 TM and find that most of the research is valid.
 An even nicer
 hope would be to find that TM research is mostly valid AND
 that TM is at least somewhat unique in positive
 ways.
 The hope to
 find that TM and other practices have the same effect
 isn't as nice as you might think at first glance simply
 because there is so much research being published right now
 on mindfulness that shows that it has small-to-moderate
 effects on health and wellbeing and virtually no studies
 that show extremely large positive effects, unlike the
 recent TM and PTSD in war refugees studies, so if TM and
 mindfulness have the same effect, then that means that TM
 really has a small-to-moderate positive effect on PTSD in
 war refugees, rather than the overwhelmingly huge positive
 effect that the two latest studies suggest.
 
 I would far
 rather that TM be uniquely positive in its effects, and
 difficult-to-teach, compared to mindfulness being easy to
 teach and having tiny positive effects. We can always train
 more TM teachers afterall.
 L
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mjackson74@...>
 wrote :
 
 Oh I know it
 happens but and I admit my experience doesn't cover ALL
 people in the world, but when I was at MIU the faculty
 members I encountered seemed to be a bit more of the True
 Believers than most of the staff and students, of course
 that could be because they were required as part of their
 jobs to really put forth the TM party line on any question
 or situation that arose. 
 
 
 
 I just hope that one day some enterprising individual will
 hire a group to analyze the entire "scientific"
 body of research on TM and TMSP, prove scientifically and
 statistically that it is NOT scientifically valid, that the
 appropriate authorities will look into the pundit program,
 see that MUM/GCWP is in violation of federal statues, shut
 down the pundit cash cow program, heavily fine the Movement,
 find the accreditation of MUM is undeserved and revoke it,
 Girish will then sell the place and all this after Hagelin
 and Moriss have had to own up to their womanizing in court,
 MUM will fire both of them, they will then turn on the
 Movement and tell all the dirty secrets to save their necks
 which will be the testimony that leads to the revoking of
 the accreditation.
 
 
 
 Also, a serious study will be undertaken to see how many
 TM'ers develop mental problems after long use of TM, the
 number of suicides and attempted suicides will be studied,
 and after all this is published, the TMO will be unable to
 claim any scientific validity to anything it does and is
 reduced to saying "We think you should do it cause we
 need your money and we think its a good thing to do."
 
 
 
 Happy Tuesday!
 
 --------------------------------------------
  On Tue, 4/8/14, steve.sundur@...
 <steve.sundur@...>
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Unstressing or Demons?
 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 Date: Tuesday, April 8, 2014, 12:50 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Well, I would
 
 say you may still be a little wet behind the ears.  I
 
 think many have taken this route.  
 
 A
 
 friend of mine who was an active teacher back in the day,
 
 and lived in FF for a spell, is now priest in an
 archdiocese
 
 in Iowa somewhere, IIRC, and he tells a similar store as
 Kai
 
 Druhl, and his objections run along the same
 
 lines.
 
 I
 
 think you have a tendency to take at face value every claim
 
 MMY or the TMO has made, and then when they don't pan
 
 out you start pounding.  I think others were able to
 
 figure in a discount for the "vision of
 
 possibilities" and go from
 
 there.
 
 Yes,
 
 some of things that have come to light in the intervening
 
 years have caused me some cognitive dissonance, and forced
 
 me to look at things differently, but I know what I have
 
 taken away from the experience overall, and that has
 allowed
 
 me to overcome some of the dysfunctional parts of it
 
 all. 
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to