Well Bhairitu, one morning I woke up and some anti TM malcontents had shot out
the windows of a bunch of cars on campus because the Iowa DOT decided to build
the bypass to the south of town rather than to the north. So I could probably
handle a little graffitti on the Dome.
OTOH, I don't understand why people don't just delete posts. Honestly, what am
I missing?
On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 11:00 AM, "Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net
[FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Share, how would you like it if you woke up one morning, went to the domes and
found that graffiti had been painted all over them. Guess you would be alright
with that?
On 09/03/2014 05:14 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
>turq, do you even realize what a malicious bully you sound like?! You want to
>nuke someone for writing a lot of posts?! I think you're the one out of
>control. You say you ignore so many people on FFL. So just add one more to
>your list. Why is it so hard for you to ignore Richard? Maybe that's what
>really gets to you. You can't ignore Richard.
>
>
>But to call overposting malicious is just, well malicious. And manipulative.
>imo.
>
>
>
>And who cares what the ex FFLer said?! They're not even here any more. But
>maybe they got to your ego. I didn't realize how important it is to you to be
>a part of a cool forum. I guess if FFL isn't cool, then it means you're not
>cool either!
>
>
>
>So you want to nuke Richard. You try shaming Rick. And you even get in a swipe
>at the TMers. Of course, to do the latter you had to get a little OCD with
>numbers. But whatever!
>
>
>There are some people who might want you to be booted. Everybody has somebody
>they'd like to boot. Is that really the answer?
>
>
>
>
>On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 3:55 AM, "TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com
>[FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>From: "jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
>
>
>To flood the forum
like a huge dump
truck is clearly
>malicious intent.
>
>I think he's gone
totally nuts.
>
>
>
>For those whose brains are so atrophied from the practice of TM that they
>cannot do math, so far this week Richard Williams has managed to make almost
>*30% of all posts* made to Fairfield Life.
>
>
>* So far this week: 177 posts out of 600 - 29.5% of all posts made to FFL
>* Week ending
Aug 30: 209
posts out of
1129 - 18.5%
of all posts
made to FFL
>* Week ending
Aug 23: 258
posts out of
943 - 27.4% of
all posts made
to FFL
>* Week ending
Aug 16: 146
posts out of
681 - 23.4% of
all posts made
to FFL
>* Week ending
Aug 09: 152
posts out of
741 - 20.5% of
all posts made
to FFL
>* Week ending
Aug 02: 112
posts out of
518 - 21.6% of
all posts made
to FFL
>* Week ending
Jul 26: 104
posts out of
439 - 23.6% of
all posts made
to FFL
>* Week ending
Jul 19: 149
posts out of
541 - 27.5% of
all posts made
to FFL
>* Week ending
Jul 12: 166
posts out of
720 - 23.1% of
all posts made
to FFL
>* Week ending
Jul 05: 167
posts out of
660 - 25.3% of all
posts made to FFL
>
>
>If that's not "flooding the forum" and "malicious intent," I don't know what
>is. NO ONE was this malicious in their overposting back when Posting Limits
>were first instituted -- not Judy, not Lawson, not Shemp. The only reason
>Richard's percentage of total posts was so low during the week ending August
>30 is that Dan Friedman tried to emulate Richard's "Net terrorist" approach
>and made 252 posts of his own, increasing the noise but decreasing Richard's
>noise ratio. If Dan hadn't been posting, Richard's percentage would have been
>23.8%.
>
>
>
>There is no sanity left there to appeal to in a person who posts this
>compulsively, and this consistently compulsively. Nuke this guy so we can
>forget him entirely, as if he had never existed.
>
>
>
>
>--- <turquoiseb@...> wrote :
>
>
>A friend who used to post here sent this short reaction to dropping by FFL for
>a look today to me in email. I thought it was worth sharing with the forum:
>
>
>No wonder I never bother looking in. Tex is outta control! Or maybe it’s just
>that there is no “there” there anymore. Tex’s eruptions are just the death
>rattle of a dead site.
>
>177 'Richard J. Williams' punditster
>46
danfriedman2002
>39 steve.sundur
>39 salyavin808
>30 jr_esq
>30
fleetwood_macncheese
>30 Share Long sharelong60
>29 Michael Jackson mjackson74
>28 nablusoss1008
>28 awoelflebater
>28 Bhairitu noozguru
>12 s3raphita
>10 emilymaenot
>9 dmevans365
>9 TurquoiseBee turquoiseb
>6 emptybill
>
>I think that "death rattle of a dead site" kinda nails it.
>
>
>
>And IMO it's clearly Rick's fault. As many have pointed out, he *could* do
>something to remove a person who has said outright that his only reason for
>posting so much is to fuck with people he doesn't like and ruin their site.
>But he doesn't. Clearly Rick doesn't read his own forum enough to even CARE
>what Richard Williams has turned the experience of reading it into.
>
>
>If it were me, given his history and how he's resisted any attempts to get him
>to lighten up for years now, I'd ban Richard for at least a year. With two
>conditions. First, if he attempts to create other IDs so he can post anyway,
>nuke each of the new IDs as they appear and make the ban permanent for life.
>Second, offer anyone still around on FFL after a year a vote to see if they
>want to allow him back. Post a few links back to this recent period in which
>he's been making 500+ posts a month to help them decide how to vote.
>
>
>No muss, no fuss, no maintenance, and maybe the forum would become a pleasant
>place to have a discussion again. Maybe.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
