--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] > In any published paper the methodology and the type of > statistical analysis along with the rational for that > particular analysis used is discussed in the paper. My > understanding is that Markovsky wanted to see the raw > data that was "crunched" by that analysis. I view > Markovsky attitude toward the ME has healthy > skepticism considering its radical nature and MIU's > refusal to share raw data was based more on the > weakness of the ME than on any bias on his part. They > were concerned that the raw data could be crunched to > show no ME. And their concern was correct. >
1) Barry definitely has biases. He admitted to me that he could see WHY the TM researchers thought he had biases,and in fact, his own published comments show a ludicrous bias that he denied showed bias (the very definition of extreme bias, I think). 2) how do you know that the recrunching of the numbers would show no ME since no-one has apparently done so? This assumption on your part shows your OWN biases, obviously... ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
