Ann, I actually like both wayback and Edg. The difference was Steve wrote one negative sentence whereas Edg wrote two long and very negative posts attacking Richard. And the first post seemed to be triggered by a difference of political opinions!
On Sunday, September 14, 2014 8:41 PM, "[email protected] [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]> wrote: ---In [email protected], <sharelong60@...> wrote : Ann, I think wayback was remiss in criticizing Steve and yet giving Edg a free pass against Richard. OTOH, I admire her for expressing an unpopular opinion. Her opinion is not necessarily unpopular. I had a problem with it as it seemed arbitrary and forced. You like Steve so you seemed to have a problem with it. Richard has been the brunt of Edg's acid writing style so he had a problem with it and Steve disagreed with Susan't assessment that it was so terrible 'cause he had his own reasons for saying it. For all we know everyone else agreed with Susan or didn't care enough to comment. So, I don't give her impulse to make the comment much credit although everyone deserves a voice here if they so choose. My beef is still the inconsistent standard for "nasty" and "inappropriate".
