Richard, in my experience, it's a funny old life and the Funny Farm Lounge is a mirror of that. Might as well enjoy (-:
On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 1:06 PM, "Richard Williams [email protected] [FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]> wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Share Long [email protected] [FairfieldLife] <[email protected]> wrote: > >Ann, I actually like both wayback and Edg. The difference was Steve wrote one >negative sentence whereas Edg wrote two long and very negative posts attacking >Richard. And the first post seemed to be triggered by a difference of >political opinions! > > This character attacked me for no apparent reason other than the fact that I voted for George W. Bush and supported the U.S. Congress when it voted to use military force to unseat Saddham Hussien in Iraq. He obviously hates George W. Bush and is prejudiced against Texans, not even realizing that GWB was born in New Haven, Connecticut. This same character then voted for Barack Obama, who currently continues to follow the Bush doctrine and the continuing war in Iraq against the terrorist killers. Barack Obama is bombing the shit out of Iraq! There have been 773,335 abortions in the U.S. so far this year and not once has this guy piped up with a message in opposition. His enemy is not the ISIS killers or the killing of children - his enemy is "willytex." Go figure. Apparently nobody posting here cares about the important issues, Share. > > > >On Sunday, September 14, 2014 8:41 PM, "[email protected] >[FairfieldLife]" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >---In [email protected], <sharelong60@...> wrote : > > >Ann, I think wayback was remiss in criticizing Steve and yet giving Edg a free >pass against Richard. OTOH, I admire her for expressing an unpopular opinion. > > >Her opinion is not necessarily unpopular. I had a problem with it as it seemed >arbitrary and forced. You like Steve so you seemed to have a problem with it. >Richard has been the brunt of Edg's acid writing style so he had a problem >with it and Steve disagreed with Susan't assessment that it was so terrible >'cause he had his own reasons for saying it. For all we know everyone else >agreed with Susan or didn't care enough to comment. So, I don't give her >impulse to make the comment much credit although everyone deserves a voice >here if they so choose. My beef is still the inconsistent standard for "nasty" >and "inappropriate". > > > > > > > > >
