On 10/18/2014 10:24 AM, [email protected] [FairfieldLife]
wrote:
These relatively small caches of weapons are not what Bush and that
other moron,
>
/The point is that nobody knew whether or not Saddam had WMD - almost
everyone believed he did, including 99% of our U.S. congressional
representatives. Almost everyone agreed on this.
Any amount of chemical weapons can be used by ISIS against the Kurds,
just like Saddam used against them. It only takes a small amount of
mustard gas to kill thousands of people in just a few minutes.The attack
on the Kurds by Iraqi forces in 1988 alone should have been enough to
justify an allied invasion - Saddam crossed a red line, but nobody had
the guts to stand up to him and do something about it. Go figure. /
/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_chemical_attack/
>
used to justify the slaughter of hundreds of thousands, in Iraq.
>
/Like most reasonable people, I place the blame for millions of deaths
squarely on Saddam Hussein - it has been the goal of three U.S.
Presidents to unseat the government of Iraq and get rid of him - only
George W. Bush had the gumption to actually do it./
>
Remember, Richard, it was the scare tactic of mentioning, "The
Mushroom Cloud". Bush and his cronies deliberately used the specter of
nuclear war to get us into Iraq. Just because the NYT and Wash Post
have now tried to revise history, doesn't make it true.
>
/You may not remember but the majority of members of the U.S. Congress
all agreed to use force to unseat Saddam because because they thought
Saddam had hidden WMD. Everyone knew this going in because Saddam had
used chemical weapons on the Kurds. The point is that nobody knew for
sure if Saddam had nuclear weapons or not. That's why we went in - to
find out once and for all so Saddam couldn't blackmail us anymore. ///
>
It was a deliberate, and still unsubstantiated LIE. No WMDs exist in
Iraq, and they never have, unless the US has now transported them there.
>
/If true, then John Kerry and Hillary Clinton are liars. In fact, there
are WMD stockpiles all over Iraq that were sold to Saddam by the
thousands by the U.S., France, and Germany. This is a matter if record./
>
---In [email protected], <punditster@...> wrote :
"No weapons of mass destruction have been found." - Judy Stein
/"Judy - I think maybe you lied to yourself too. Before the invasion,
did you post any statements expressing any doubts that Saddam had WMD?
If you did, maybe I missed it. Both The Times and The Post published
editorials supporting the claim that Saddam had WMD. But it seems to
me that it was a given, by everyone, except maybe Scott Ritter -
including both Democrats and Republicans - Blix, the U.N., France,
Germany, Great Britain, and U.S.A. etc., that Saddam had WMD, and
everyone apparently agreed."/ - Richard J. Williams, 2003
>
On 10/17/2014 6:47 PM, emptybill@... <mailto:emptybill@...>
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Remember how W. and Chaney "lied" because there "never" were
WMD's in Iraq? Heh Heh.
>
/There are stockpiles of WMD all over the Iraq countryside now in
the possession of ISIS./
>
Didn't you read the NYT article? They found over 5000 individual
bombs and artillery shells with mustard gas and sarin gas. They
were NOT all found much less destroyed before Barack Hussein
Ebola ordered US troops out of the country.
Anbar provice is still full of undocumented caches of these
supplies. ISIS rules most of Anbar, so they may try to use these
WMD to strike Baghdad.
After all - this is what you get from a neo-marxist.
