Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Where is Mr. M.DIXON?

[MDixon6569]

In a message dated 11/30/05 12:02:42 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You still haven't proven it. You didn't even prove it for JFK and Reagan, whose tax cuts were far greater, percentage-wise, than Bush's. Also, over what time-period were these previous tax cuts sucessful? Sparaig it's not that important to me to do the necessary googling. What specifically would you accept as proof? The tax cuts are permanently successful. They never lead to a declining revenue once they take effect because the economy expands and creates more tax payers which always make up the difference plus. Now it's also possible that the government can out grow the tax cuts, but that is done by spending at a faster rate than tax revenues are coming in. That is why when presidents cut taxes to stimulate growth they plead with their congresses to hold increased spending to the same rate of inflation to allow the growth of the economy to proceed at a faster pace than the growth of the government spending. This prevents deficit spending. However , some times deficit spending can be necessary and over time the deficits can be grown out of as the economy expands and the tax base broadens to include more tax payers. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' SPONSORED LINKS Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.