--- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > Yes, they are the few that realize within some ....
> > >
> > >
> > > Was that in the recent Zogby poll? What was the percentage?
Else,
> > how
> > > do you know its "a few"?
> > >
> > From what the world's attention is focused on. If it were many,
it
> > would be reflected more widely through the media. And people
would
> > discuss it more openly.
>
> Have you ever considered that it may be so obvious to most that it
> barely warrants much mention. Like talking about the air.
Sure. Ask the next person you speak with whom you don't have a prior
relationship with about it, and see what they say.
>
> > It is also the way evolution works,
>
> This is a personal cognition of all creation? Or a story you were
told?
Neither. Common sense.
> >why
> > there are far more ants than elephants.
>
> And I suppose you are an elephant?
Last time I looked in the mirror, I wasn't. You? C'mon, it was an
analogy...
>
> Thats another facet of the co-dependent bound/not-bound cycle
story.
> When one becomes liberated, they become superior. I guess thats the
> difference between the first category ("I have no awareness of
> boundaries") and the third stage of seekerdom "I have no awareness
of
> boundaries, EVER".
Sounds like bullshit. Of course there are boundaries. Anyone that
doesn't recognize them is not Enlightened, they are *insane*.
There's a difference. it is just that in Enlightenment, the
perception of boundaries doesn't any longer predominate in the
awareness.
>
> I observe people in the third stage, per their own story (I am not
> acknowleging any reality of a third stage or any stages), tend to
> express a sense of superiority. And reasonably so per their story.
> "Most are in ignorance and boundaries, I am not, I am liberated, I
am
> the elephant, they are the ants." But what if its only a story.
What
> if one never bought into ignorance and boundaries in the first
place?
Great. Saved themselves some work. Only what is "the first place"?
>
> Then there is no seeking, no seeker, no teacher for the seeker, no
> seeker for the teacher, no boundaries to realize were never there,
no
> ignorance to realize was never there. No co-depenedency, no
> superiority, no stories.
>
What reality are you describing? Or is it your fantasy? Sounds like
your fantasy to me.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
