---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 You think *possibly* quite a few women fought Alexander's armies? Really? 
Maybe they fought off rapists but I seriously doubt they fought as soldiers, 
but then maybe you could enlighten us with some archeologically/anthropological 
 facts.Warriors, particularly Kshatriya were *protectors* of women, children 
the elderly and society in general. Stories of Amazons were just that, stories 
and legends by the Greeks.
 You might listen to a few more Maharishi tapes regarding the human nervous 
system. He frequently spoke about women having a more refined and delicate 
nervous system which allowed them to have even deeper experiences than many 
men. He also spoke about the effects of stress on human evolution.
 Maharishi said that a new born's level of consciousness is closest to that of 
the mother. What effect would something like PTSD have on a child born to a 
mother with that condition. W
 e know the kinds of effects Alcohol, and drugs consumed by pregnant mothers 
has on new born children. 

 So far, women haven't been forced into combat situations, exposing them to 
that trauma. Do we really want to go there? Yeah, I do think exposing women to 
the trauma of combat could make them, in general, terrible mothers. In our 
current social structure, women are the nurturers while fathers are the 
providers. Do you want  mothers with PTSD raising small children? Shaken baby 
syndrome is bad enough already. Reintroducing tens of thousands of women of 
child baring age, back from combat, could only make such situations worse.

 "I have no idea what you're talking about" was probably the most intelligent 
comment you have made in that post.


 http://https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_ancient_warfare 
http://https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_ancient_warfare

 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 10:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Women Should be Drafted into the Military
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <mdixon.6569@...> wrote :

 WWMD? Doesn't sound very *Vedic* to me. Wondering how many women fought 
Alexander the Great. 
 

 Possibly quite a few.  
 

 Doesn't Maharishi talk about the delicate female nervous system and it should 
be protected to protect future generations, or sumpin like that?
 

 What in the world does this mean?  
 

 We're already producing a lot of *f*ed up kids as it is. 
 

 What are you talking about here and how does this point relate to either what 
MMY said (whatever it was) or the point in question?   
 

 Imagine women coming home from prolonged military engagements and then having 
kids. 
 

 Do you think this isn't happening?  What are you trying to imply here?  
 

 That women who serve in the military or in combat positions will make terrible 
mothers?  Huh?  
 

 I don't know, maybe just the *chauvinism* in me. Watcha think Emily and Anne?

 

 I have *NO IDEA* what you are talking about.  
 

 --------------------------------------------------------
 

 I'm a conscientious objector and I am completely opposed to the draft for 
everyone. 
 

 If there is a draft under the most extreme of circumstances, it should be an 
equal opportunity draft.  No more baby boomer generations!  Why should society 
take care of all those extra people?  Who is going to pay for that?

 

 


 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 12:03 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Women Should be Drafted into the Military

 
   
 Two generals recommended this idea to a senate panel.  What do you think?
 

 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/generals-women-register-draft-161631772--politics.html
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/generals-women-register-draft-161631772--politics.html?soc_src=mail&soc_trk=ma
 

 


 














 


 










Reply via email to