All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time. ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote :
P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your sources. ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote : And your sources for this claim are what, now? I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the Hillary Clinton email scandal. ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote : Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. Can anyone figure this out? ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : ... why exactly were they sharing devices? ---In [email protected], <awoelflebater@...> wrote : http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
