As you know, the sentence in red is the only one that's factual in the paragraph from your post below. The others are either nonfactual or misleading.
(Note to Doug, per your recent diktat: I'm making this post because I believe attempts to mislead and deceive, such as in the post I'm responding to, are spiritually harmful, not just to the people who read them but also to the person who posts them. We would all be much better off spiritually if we refrained from making such attempts and instead did our best to stick to the truth.) ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : So, Hillary used a cloth to wipe her home-brew mail server; her staff used BlechBit on her HD; the FBI destroyed two laptops, after giving immunity; and the DNC staffers used hammers to destroy dozens of phones - but you're thinking that none of the phones or servers or laptops had any of Huma's email on them? Go figure. ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote : As you know, this wasn't done by the FBI, nor was it done to Abedin's and Weiner's devices... ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : According to what I've read, BleachBit was used on one device and a hammer on several others. ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote : "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your sources. And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time. ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote : P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your sources. ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote : And your sources for this claim are what, now? I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the Hillary Clinton email scandal. ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote : Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. Can anyone figure this out? ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : ... why exactly were they sharing devices? ---In [email protected], <awoelflebater@...> wrote : http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
