So, you don't know how Huma's emails got on Anthony's laptop. Someone as devious as Weiner, he's probably made backups on an external drive and mailed them to Wikileaks already. We will probably find out when Comey makes the FBI transcript of the Weiner interview public after the investigation is completed.
Until then, all we know is that a perv was sending and receiving emails on the Clinton home-brew server. According to what I've read, it's a trove. It's not likely that Weiner made 650,000 emails himself - you'd have to be generating thousands of sexting messages every day for a decade, right? ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote : As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were on Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she wouldn't know which emails they were. (BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.") It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years. Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection with Clinton's server. As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI found no indications of any intent to withhold those emails. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to Hillary's home-brew server. The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on Wiener's laptop? If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously it's a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling you, it's a Potemkin village all the way down. ---In [email protected], <authfriend@...> wrote : The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails. So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense. ---In [email protected], <[email protected]> wrote : The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?
