Feste,
 

 Comey is stuck in the so called "material world" which he has to function in 
since he is the director of the FBI, one  who is to provide an objective 
conclusion.  Scientifically speaking, he has to make a determination if there 
is an evidence whether a violation of the laws has occurred or not.  Without 
any evidence, he cannot make any definite conclusion.  However, he can make a 
statement that he has no evidence to make a conclusion.  As such, any number of 
scenarios can be possible: a)  Hillary is innocent, b) Hillary is guilty, c) 
Trump staged the entire event to force the investigation, d) the Russians were 
trying to influence the election.  Given the situation, Comey will more likely 
say Hillary is innocent or that there is no evidence to show that any violation 
was committed.
 

 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :


 I'm a little behind regarding last Friday's news, but the FBI director reminds 
me of a bad soccer referee who after a particular incident refuses to award one 
team a penalty kick in the first half of a match and is so vilified by the team 
and their fans that in the second half he decides to award a penalty kick to 
the same team even though there is absolutely no good reason for doing so, even 
though he tries to make one up. Bad, weak, unfair refereeing. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <jr_esq@...> wrote :

 
 

 Ann,
 

 I don't believe you'd want to miss all the twists and turns that this election 
creating.  Now, the FBI director is being accused of violating the Hatch Act or 
trying to influence the election.  Personally, I wouldn't want to be placed in 
that situation.  I would suspect that the director won't make any conclusion 
about the emails until the election is over.  If he did, both camps would 
accuse of one violation of the other.
 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote :


 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <j_alexander_stanley@...> wrote :

 A friend on Facebook posted this: "I wonder how much it would cost to have 
myself put into a medically induced coma until November 9th. Would Medicare 
cover that?"
 

 Exaaaaactly!!
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <awoelflebater@...> wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<j_alexander_stanley@...> wrote :

 I get all my news from The Borowitz Report. I'd probably kill myself, 
otherwise.
 

 No kidding. I told my husband to hit me over the head with a sledgehammer and 
wake me up on Nov. 9. He thought that was a good idea for a couple of reasons.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<jr_esq@...> wrote :

 The Brits here should be feeling smug about this report.
 

 Queen Offers to Restore British Rule Over United States - The New Yorker 
http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/queen-offers-to-restore-british-rule-over-united-states
 
 
 
http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/queen-offers-to-restore-british-rule-over-united-states
 
 Queen Offers to Restore British Rule Over United St... 
http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/queen-offers-to-restore-british-rule-over-united-states
 “This two-hundred-and-forty-year experiment in self-rule began with the best 
of intentions, but I think we can all agree that it didn’t end well,” she said.


 
 View on www.newyorker.com 
http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/queen-offers-to-restore-british-rule-over-united-states
 Preview by Yahoo 
 


 

 

 













Reply via email to