--- In [email protected], "mrsatva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Yes there is a lot of talking about Worl Peace and so on. But do
> > > people REALY talk to each other ? If not, why not ?  
> > 
> > About what? The TMO isn't a religion or philosophy per se. On 
this 
> > newsgroup you have people like Shemp and Judy who are completely 
> > opposed to each other on virtually every topic, who both meditate 
via 
> > TM and both believe/hope that it may have some long-term effect 
for 
> > the good of the world. What, other than TM, would Shemp and Judy 
have 
> > to discuss in a non-confrontational way?
> 
> Thats fine for FFL. But what about daily TM-center life ?

What about them? Since the formal on-topic discussions at the TM-
center are always about TM and related stuff, no problem, eh?

>   
> > > Does this meen, most tm peoples think that they can reach
> > > enlightenment without taking care about others and without 
taking
> > > responsiballity for theire aktion/nonaktion ?
>  
> > Nevertheless, the TMO's *teaching* on the subject of charity and 
all 
> > other relative behaviors is that you follow your own 
> > religion/conscience on such things. That people may not be doing 
so 
> > suggests that they are being *lazy* aoubt their own religious 
> > traditions, not that the TMO is discouraging them from following 
them.
> 
> Mayby that has been the teaching at the beginning of the moovment.
> Today there is meditation plus MMY-Ayurveda plus MMY-Yotisch plus
> MMY-Jagya plus MMY-Gandharva Ved plus a lott of other MMY-Veda-
things.
> I dont want to take MMY responsibel for everry of his followers 
funny
> idear/interpretation. But he is aktualy pushing people into somthing
> called "Vedik culture". "Tear down your citty and rebuild it 
akording
> MMY-Stapatha Ved". Thats quite strong culturel enterference!     
> 


Sure, but its non-demonimational. Applies to all of India as well.

> > > I think it is the other way round. Only this to thinks can bring
> > > enlightenment.
> > 
> > Define "taking responsibility for one's own actions" in a way 
that 
> > fits all cultures.
> 
> Just commen sence.  

Riiiight. And you're familiar with every culture, including ones that 
revere lying and deception towards outsiders?

>  
> > > > > Is that any different than the way a corporation functions? 
> > > > 
> > > > No.
> > > > 
> > > > > Should it be?
> > > > 
> > > > In my opinion, yes. Unless you believe that organizations
> > > > that profess to teach a pathway to enlightenment should
> > > > be nothing more than big corporations, intent on making
> > > > a profit. 
> > > 
> > > In my opinion, no. It should not function the way a corporation 
> > intent
> > > on making a profit funktions but like a corporation intent on 
> > selling
> > > social goods (social work...). 
> > >    
> > 
> > A non-profit organization is every bit as dependent on customers 
> > (donors) as a profit-making one. Charities have to advertise 
their 
> > product (good works) in order to keep running. 
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Mr Satva
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to