|
On Jan 8, 2006, at 4:36 PM, a_non_moose_ff wrote:
In many satsangs, bringing up such topics is considered intellectualization or worse: dualistic. Whatever the case, it's not common for there to be some *undertone* of subtle condescension when such items are mentioned. What this often means is someones ego has been stepped on...often one of the 'enlightened ones'. It's also not uncommon IME for an 'enlightened one' to attempt profundity and an utterly and plainly incorrect View (about reality). I remember one such gathering where the 'enlightened one' waxed neoadvaitic on how the state of Brahman / Unity consciousness could be understood by the Two Truths. The crowd bought it. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Watering down advaita Vaj
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Watering down advaita Vaj
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Watering down advaita a_non_moose_ff
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Watering down advaita Vaj
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Watering down advaita a_non_moose_ff
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Watering down advaita a_non_moose_ff
