Go Steve! What a great Op-Ed piece. Absolutely
brilliant using the Bible to ground a moral argument.
Love to see what a Fundie can say in response. 


> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Dick Mays
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Today the Des Moines Register is running my
> opinion piece on the 
> > spiritual pollution of high-density hog farms.  It
> is attached and 
> > reproduced below.  As the editors note in their
> headline 
> introducing 
> > the essay, it is "the most damning argument
> against large hog 
> > confinements."  Feel free to circulate it broadly.
> 
> > 
> > The editors apparently timed the publication of
> this essay to 
> > coincide with today's meeting of the Iowa
> Environmental Protection 
> > Commission to consider the state Department of
> Natural Resources 
> > proposal to give the agency more flexibility in
> evaluating 
> > construction-permit applications for new livestock
> operations.
> > 
> > Steven Druker
> > _______________________________________
> > 
> > NOTE: The opinion piece reproduced below is
> running in the Des 
> Moines 
> > Register today (January 17, 2006).  It is preceded
> by the heading 
> > with which it is introduced in the online edition
> of the Opinion 
> > Section headline page. 
> > 
> <http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?
>
category=OPINION>http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?
> category=OPINION      
> > 
> > Columnists - opinion
> > 
> >
> <http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?
> AID=/20060117/OPINION01/60116008/1035/OPINION>Iowa 
> > View: Do hog confinements pollute the spirit?
> > 
> > Even with all the environmental pollution they
> cause, the most 
> > damning argument against large hog confinements is
> the way we the 
> > animals are treated. Ponder this: How would Jesus
> farm?
> > �..   ���..      ����..
> >
> <http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?
>
AID=/20060117/OPINION01/60116008/1035/OPINION>http://desmoinesregiste
> r.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?
> AID=/20060117/OPINION01/60116008/1035/OPINION
> > Iowa View: Do hog confinements pollute the spirit?
> > By STEVEN DRUKER
> > SPECIAL TO THE REGISTER
> > January 17, 2006
> > 
> > 
> > Amid all the controversy about high-density hog
> confinements, one 
> key 
> > point has been largely ignored: that no matter how
> foul their 
> > discharge into our waters or how vile their stench
> in the nostrils 
> of 
> > neighbors, their most severe form of pollution is
> spiritual.
> > 
> > They blight the soul of any society that supports
> them because 
> they 
> > flagrantly violate fundamental ethical principles,
> principles that 
> > did not spring from the minds of animal-welfare
> activists but that 
> > are firmly embedded within the Bible.
> > 
> > While the Bible proclaims human dominion over
> animals and 
> recognizes 
> > our rights to harness their strength and consume
> their flesh, 
> these 
> > rights are clearly conditioned on treating them
> kindly. Not only 
> does 
> > the Bible forbid causing animals unnecessary pain,
> it repeatedly 
> > instructs us to consider their needs and uphold
> their welfare.
> > 
> > For instance, Deuteronomy 22:10 prohibits yoking
> an ox with a 
> donkey. 
> > Commentators recognize this rule aims to prevent
> suffering, 
> because 
> > the smaller, weaker donkey will be strained
> through linkage with 
> the 
> > ox. Deuteronomy 25:4 bans another form of
> unkindness by declaring, 
> > "You shall not muzzle the ox when he treads out
> the grain." While 
> the 
> > former rule respects the distinct natures of
> animals, this one 
> > protects their natural desires from being unfairly
> frustrated, 
> even 
> > if it would be more cost-effective to do so.
> > 
> > Through these examples, the Bible teaches that
> besides refraining 
> > from unnecessary physical force, we must also
> avoid subjecting 
> > animals to less blatant forms of distress,
> psychological as well 
> as 
> > physical. Moreover, in Exodus 23:5, the Bible
> imposes a duty to 
> > alleviate an animal's suffering when we encounter
> it, even if we 
> in 
> > no way caused the predicament.
> > 
> > Although the Bible also contains rules about
> animals that pertain 
> > specifically to the Jewish people, those that
> command kindness 
> toward 
> > them express universal principles and extend to
> humankind. By 
> urging 
> > the Jews to uphold the laws of the Torah, Jesus
> endorsed these 
> rules 
> > of compassion. There's no indication his disciples
> ever questioned 
> > their validity for gentiles.
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to