--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
> >> Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >> I wonder if your observation syncs with his
> >> publication of "Is Consciousness the Unified Field?"
> >
> > Seems to me that lecture came out some years later.
> >
> > So, is it the sense of the meeting that consciousness
> > is *not* the unified field?
> I'm not sure what meeting you mean. "Is Consciousness the Unified  
> Field" was a paper Hagelin wrote year ago.

"Sense of the meeting" is a phrase I've heard meeting 
facilitators use. It feels out how the group feels without 
voting. It takes into account with strength with which 
people hold views, as well as the number of people 
who hold a given view. 

I've only been following this thread with one eye, as 
it were, so I may have misapprehended what you all 
are talking about. I thought there was some discussion 
of whether consciousness was indeed the unified field.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing

To subscribe, send a message to:

Or go to: 
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to