--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >  Go back and reread the threads that you had with me and Shemp,
> and  see if they follow "focus on ideas and not the person". You used
> the  same tactics in both threads. 
> > > 
> 
> > 
> > OK.Well do. Sometimes I slip up.
> > 
> > But you may want to re read the shemp posts. I suspect you missed
> the point and tactic.
> >
> 
> Yup. Just as I suspected. Your points are reflecting some cognitive
> kink that you have -- perhaps due to pre-conceptioning about what you
> are reading.
> 
> 
> "follow "focus on ideas and not the person". You used the
> same tactics in both threads." 
> 
> foufou post re shemp post:
> 
> "You gotta love that crazy wisdom stuff. Its clear that Shemp is just
> trying to push your buttons. I mean no one could be that big of a
> retarted dumbfuck dickwad and make such a statement in earnest. I mean
> its like saying all Canadians are smalled-dick weasal fuck-ups with
> shit for brains. I mean just because there are a few, doesn't mean all
> canadians are like that. You gotta love that crazy wisdom stuff.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/88782
>  
> Where so I say anything bad about shemp? 
> 
> "Its clear that Shemp is just trying to push your buttons. I mean no
> one could be that big of a
> retarted dumbfuck dickwad and make such a statement in earnest."
> 
> I am complimenting shemp, viewing him as too wise to make foolish
> statements in earnest.
> 
> "I mean its like saying all Canadians are smalled-dick weasal fuck-ups
> with shit for brains."
> 
> That is a conditional statement. The conditon is not met. Thus, the
> statement is not applicable or directed towards shemp. Did you miss
that?
> 
> I was playing on the sticks and stones argument -- similar to "its
> just a cartoon" argument, similar to the defacing flags argument "Its
> just a piece  of cloth."  Since Shemp appears to adhere to the "Its
> just a cartoon" argument, it would be consistent of him to adhere to
> the other parallel arguemnts. If he became unglued at the above quote,
> it would be a learning moment for him perhaps, seeing that he himself
> was very sensitive to some words, and perhaps help him see other
> cultures may be sensitive to things to which he is not.
> 
> "I mean just because there are a few, doesn't mean all
> canadians are like that."
> 
> In the above, I was using shemps logic, applied to an absurdity. 
> Again, hoping to trigger some flash of understanding within shemp when
> he read it.
> 
> So several levels, several tactics and aims of the post. None of which
> was an attack onshemp. 

----------------
----------------
> 
> Johnny, I suspect from your comments that at times your reading or
> understanding of some posts is weak or superficial And you react
> strongly to your weak understanding, not the post itself -- as written.
>

-----------------
-----------------

What more can I say, 
I rest my case, and my weak understanding.

JohnY






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to