--- In [email protected], Michael Dean Goodman 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

a very thoughtful essay, which I think I saw the first time round. 

For a long time I too mistakenly thought that a priority goal was to 
make TM available widely, in order to generate support for its 
teachers and programmes in society. There are plenty of examples of 
Movements with humble beginning gathering momentum and resources and 
respectability. But when the Natural Law Parties came into being the 
voters had already been turned off. The course fee issue had a moral 
dimension to it - fine, charge what you like, but make special 
concessions for pensioners, students & unemployed. Not doing so was, 
and remains, uncharitable and offensive. 

Then there was the paradox of Nature Support - hardly any was coming 
Maharishi's way. Unlike the IRA, the PLO and countless other 
terrorist organizations who attracted huge donations like a magnet, 
to finance their operations, Maharishi had to resort to increasingly 
distasteful practices that made the TMO look like the money-grabbing 
organization it has become. 

Then there was the issue of how this money was being used. Instead 
of oozing in creativity and efficiency (like its scientific charts 
had promised) the TMO turned out to be a commercial disaster area. 
So many projects started, hardly any realised. Even its 
incredible "products" like TM and Amrit Kallash failed to make any 
commercial impact. Countless bad investments and dishonourable 
misappropriations of donations have ensured that even the mass of TM 
practitioners now distance themselves from the TMO. 

But the worst disaster was its inability to use its global resources 
to set up even ONE permanent group of 8,000 anywhere, in all these 
years since it became apparent that this alone could transform 
everything, way back in the 1990s - the  more so in the light of 
patent mistrust and disinterest from "governments". 

We come finally to the latest master plan - the adoption of 24 
countries. Why not stick with 8,000 groups in India, with the $1 
billion fund-raising for that; or better still, with financing that 
from its own global resources (many times over this figure anyway)?
But it is typical of MMY to announce a new initiative - Peace 
Palaces in hundreds of cities (instead of starting one real one 
somewhere important) - then soon after shifting the focus on an even 
more unrealistic goal - eg the reconstruction of Geneva and all 
major cities or government buildings, ampounting to hundreds of 
TRILLIONS of dollars. So now supposedly the focus is on 24 
countries - when it should have remained India, with perhaps the 
addition of the real open wounds of the world - the Middle East and 
the horn of Africa. 

I write this in the same spirit as Michael Dean's - as my 
personal "opinion" of the "facts". An opinion moreover which has 
increasingly become less relevant in my life, as indeed MMY and even 
TM now have. I hope, for the sake of humanity, that your optimism 
about MMY's legacy will prove right. But right now I can't even see 
a single ray of hope anywhere I look in the TMO. Because you have 
had good experiences with TM you are willing to give MMY all the 
benefit of the doubt. It's a familiar stance - I had it too once, 
and I can see how fundamentalists everywhere end up doing the same, 
as the goal ends up justifying the means. But looking at it 
dispassionately, it never does. The means need to ring true as well.






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to