I often appreciate your point of view which recognizes the value of
the technique and the notion that some things are at least within the
realm of the conceivable (if not the practical, or maybe even
possible), but I have to ask here--whence arrise the need to test
whose loyalty?

Why does any governor who had been active *especially* during the past
15-20 years or longer need their loyalty tested?

Why does any ordinary practitioner of TM need loyalty at all, let
alone need to have it tested?

> Perhaps you're right, or perhaps they'll read the bitterness of the 
> independent teachers, realize that the Rajah thing is just a loyalty 
> test, chuckle, and go with what seems to be the organization more 
> likely to survive in the long run.

To subscribe, send a message to:

Or go to: 
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to