--- In [email protected], "Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], anony_sleuth_ff <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], anony_sleuth_ff > > <no_reply@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I think there is *some*. The most glaring evidence > > > > > > that something funny was going on is what happened on > > > > > > the stock market in the days before the attack. I > > > > > > haven't seen anybody even attempt to make a case that > > > > > > that was benign. > > > > > > > > > > From the Loose Change video, their argument was that trading > > in > > > > > Boeing options volume was 2x,3x and 5x or something some days > > or > > > > weeks > > > > > prior to 9/11. In itself, that means nothing. Stock or option > > > > volume > > > > > can vary widely -- on any number of factors -- including quite > > > > mundane > > > > > and benign ones. Look to the Force Luke (and Judy) -- aka the > > > > > statistics 101 class you took years ago. > > > > > > > > > > How many standard deviations from the mean was the event (s)? > > The > > > > above > > > > > numbers could have been 1 SD -- quite frequent, or a six- sigma > > > > event > > > > > --- very, very rare. Present the statistics (Yahoo Finance may > > > > have), > > > > > then make a case. > > > > > > > > > > For fun I might look up the data and see. I bet it was an event > > > > > happening once every 3-12 months, or 1-4 times a year or more. > > > > > > > > > > And why focus only on Boeing? If the market as a whole dumped > > after > > > > > 9/11 (after market reopenened in 3-4 days, as I recall. Why > > not > > > > just > > > > > short the S&P 500 or buy puts options on the S&P 500. That > > would be > > > > > much harder to see and trace anomolies due to volume. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fortunately, the good people at Yahoo! Finance lets you see the > > > > historical trading volume and prices for any given stock. > > > > > > > > For Boeing from August 1, 2001 to September 11, 2001, here is > > the > > > > daily volume and closing prices of the stock (hey, I got to do > > > > another tiny url!): > > > > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/ncl7l > > > > > > > > One can take any stock and do similar research for it. > > > > > > > > So I fully expect Judy-Petooty to roll up her sleeves and back > > up > > > > the nutty statement she made in a previous post regarding that > > this > > > > is where the key evidence is to be found. > > > > > > > > Get to work, Judy! > > > > > > And if I heard it correctly, I believe the video said $28 million > > was > > > made on the options. Hardly much of a sum for the cost and > > > ramifications of "creating" 9/11. > > > > > > > > > $28 million would be a snivel. > > > +++ Still not too bad as a collateral benefit. >
...not if everything everyone has been discussing has been accurate. The money that can be made on a successful put option is enormous...and I'm not talking $28 million. With the kind of volume that has been discussed here that it is alleged was traded then the profits would be at least $200 million. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
