--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > I'm pointing out that it's 
> > nonsensical for you to ask *me* to prove the experts
> > were right in thinking there were anomalies significant
> > enough to warrant investigation.
> If all you are saying inall of this is the experts thoughtthere were
> anomalies significant enough to warrant investigation" fine, no
> disagreemnt. I have said nothing to contradict this obvious point.

That's all I've ever said.  Why have you been arguing
with me if you agree?

> My repeated point, quite different from the above, is that no
> investigation, article or person to my knowledge has shown any
> analysis that the trading deviated from the long-run norm in
> statistical significant way.

Mark Meredith just said the data was easily available--
which is what I was saying as well, and you were denying--
and was clearly statistically significant.

> We have such a huge semantic gap here, further discussion seems
> unproductive.

Interesting how you always seem to manage to create
these "huge semantic gaps" that make further discussion
unproductive when you've been shown to be embarrassingly

To subscribe, send a message to:

Or go to: 
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to