--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], anony_sleuth_ff <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > I'm pointing out that it's > > > nonsensical for you to ask *me* to prove the experts > > > were right in thinking there were anomalies significant > > > enough to warrant investigation. > > > > If all you are saying inall of this is the experts thoughtthere were > > anomalies significant enough to warrant investigation" fine, no > > disagreemnt. I have said nothing to contradict this obvious point. > > That's all I've ever said. Why have you been arguing > with me if you agree?
Because you have said the stock volumes have factually been shown to be statistically significant anomolies of normal long run trading patterns, yet you failed to cite any study or investigation that concludes that. I have simply and repeated asked, what studies, what data, what analysis. Where have you been? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
