--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Translation: Barry is jealous that Judy got all the publicity > so now he wants to cash in on it by piggybacking a guest > editorial.
"Got all the publicity?" I was partly joking about the attempt to hijack FFL and turn it into the cesspool that you guys turned a.m.t. into, but I guess maybe I was onto something. Do you *really* think in terms of "getting all the publicity" when posting here? Is *that* why you post so much? Sad, if so. I was away all weekend, and returned to find Fairfield Life having been turned into an intellectual sewer. I was merely commenting on who managed to do that, and what their inner motives might have been *for* doing it. I didn't notice that this weekend you were one of the three people I was speaking about who managed to make the entire newsgroup all about them and their insecurities. But judging by the defensive way you jumped right in here and couldn't wait to attack me, maybe you wish you had been. > -- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > > > > > The Raja of Compton California now declares this thread > > > > boring and ended! > > > > > > Either that or it should be retitled, > > > "How three people with out of control egos > > > hijacked a spiritual group and brought it > > > down to the level of infantile egobabble." > > > > I think there is a lesson to be learned from > > the veritable orgy of flatulence that was FFL > > this weekend. > > > > A few people, with different political leanings > > but with one thing in common, managed to side- > > track ALL spiritual discussion on the newsgroup > > and turn Fairfield Life into a 500+-post demon- > > stration of, "It's all about US...*WE* are what's > > important here!" > > > > The one thing that these three posters have in > > common? All three have a history of being a little > > light in the loafers in terms of personal, subjective > > spiritual experience, and all three have a history of > > reacting badly and agressively when people here who > > *have* had such experiences choose to report them. > > > > One might suggest that the people who have no exper- > > iences with higher states of consciousness of their > > own to talk about, and who have a history of being > > agressive and skeptical when others talk about them, > > might subconsciously be wanting to shift the focus of > > Fairfield Life *AWAY* from such discussions, and > > *TOWARDS* discussions that focus on "I am right, you > > are wrong," "I have no hidden agenda but you have one," > > and "I'm smart and you're not." In other words, the > > mundane level at which *they* live and operate. > > > > Voila. A few 500-post slugfests and all that gets > > talked about is mundane, everyday political bull- > > shit, and no one is talking about enlightenment > > any more. > > > > Welcome to the alt.meditation.transcendalization > > of Fairfield Life. > > > > :-) :-) :-) > > > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
