--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Its too bad straight forward questions can't be asked and answered. > > For example, > > > > > > "Jim, you appear to imply that you have a perfected intellect. > Perhaps > > not, perhaps you meant something other than this interpretation. > > However, if its the former, it raises questions, in that a number > of > > your posts, IMO, do not relect the logic of someone with a > perfected > > intellect. Thats not a proof, its an opinion and perhaps is based > on > > differing views between us on what a "perfected intellect" means. > > Thus, to advance the points of yours and related posts, I hope you > do > > not take offense in my asking: i) did you mean to infer that you > have > > a perfected intellect, ii) if so, can you be precise as to what you > > mean by that term, and how such a perfected intellect has manifest > in > > your conclusions, decisions and life?" > > > to answer your example question, what I mean by a perfected > intellect is an intellect stabilized at the intersection of the > past, the future, and infinite space. Maybe it is simpler to call it > the center of time and space, the starting point.
I assume by the center of time and space, the starting point, you mean Consciousness aware of Itself and not some reference to big bang / and or singularities. Assuming the former, from my perspective, it seems incomplete to refer to it as the starting point. It is completeness, the non-starting, non-ending, non-point. Does your reason for reference to a space and time starting point because you experience a source of knowldge in that? If so, it makes some sense from my experince, though your words, to me do not clearly get to that point. I used to discuss with Rory, both on and off line, what I referred to as exploding bindu points ofknowledge. Probably a silly name for it, but its what came to mind. Tiny, apparent "seeds" of light "within" consciousness that when directed attention was placed on them, would explode to full form like a seed to a giant sequoia -- within an instant. The "full tree" would "explain" the question inherent in the "directed attention". I would undersand the 'thing" as if suddenly I had been connected to a billion terabyte lan. But this had little to do with the intellect, as I use the term. The bindu points were in a fetile field "near" the intellect -- the intellect could make distinctions regarding it, but the mechanics of the exploding bindu was not an "intelectual" process. A most high role of the intellect, in my experience, as I have posted in more detail previously, is not to discern ordescribe what IS, but to discern clearly what IS not. In particular that it, the intellect has its own discrete nature, according to which it functions -- and that it -- the intellect -- is not the controller, doer or decison maker. It is not the real "I", but is quite adept as masquerading as "i". Its a well honed "process", processing inputs according to its nature. > extending outwards from the starting point in space and time is a > spherical progression of infinite points of space, and extending > both backwards and forwards in time, an infinite progression of > moments.So it is through the precision of the pure intellect that > this matrix of time in space is maintained. In my experience, that would be the role of the unperfected intellect. The mistake of the intellect to divide IT into a discrete, false sense of an infinite flow of separate moments and chopped up space -- the realm of the myth of the individual. Its when the intellect "gets it" and sees this mistake, aided by intuition / exploding bindus of knowledge, that the intellect gets more polished and "glows" towards more perfection. > Not through conscious effort, > more like a tool always available, always present, self-sustaining. > Think of it as something found, as opposed to something that is mine > or yours or anyone else's. I am just reporting something I found, no > more 'mine' that the air we breathe. In my eperience, the bindu/knowledge "hot spots" are more closely described as a "universal" that is found / revealed. The intellect is something quite distinct, something originally at the core of the myth of individuality, and later glows and polishes itself to the extent of knowing it is not the individual, not the doer, not the controller, but a delicate, precise powerful, but limited instrument of decernment, discrimination and analysis. Your comments about perfected intellect at the core of space and time perhaps are getting to the point of what some refer to as "the cosmic computer". That would be more towards the bindu hot spots of knowledge I was referring to earlier. But has little to do with any perfected "individual" intellect. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
