--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 4/16/06 10:24:59 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Was that a regime change policy? > > Of course it was. > > "States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of > evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons > of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. > They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to > match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to > blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of > indifference would be catastrophic. > > "We will work closely with our coalition to deny terrorists and their > state sponsors the materials, technology, and expertise to make and > deliver weapons of mass destruction. We will develop and deploy > effective missile defenses to protect America and our allies from > sudden attack. (Applause.) And all nations should know: America > will do what is necessary to ensure our nation's security. > > "We'll be deliberate, yet time is not on our side. I will not wait > on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws > closer and closer. The United States of America will not permit the > world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most > destructive weapons." > > --George Bush, State of the Union address, 1/29/02 > > "It's very definitely a clear statement of the president's attitude > and it leans -- it seems to me -- toward a policy of telling these > governments that if they do not get out of business of terror and > developing weapons of mass destruction, they stand at risk of their > regimes being deposed forcefully by the United States." > > --James Woolsey, former CIA director, on PBS "Newshour" 1/30/02 > > > > In 1998 the president of the United States and the Congress set a national > policy of regime change for Iraq, not any other country.
Oh, please. Iraq is and was a > totally different situation than Iran. Nobody has threatened Iran with regime > change as a policy but they were put on notice that spreading terrorism and > WMD's would not be tolerated. Or there would be regime change. So what does Iran do? They start developing their > own WMD's , nukes. Like the child that is told not to play in the street for > it's own safety, and what does it do, but goes out onto the freeway. Or the kid whose molester threatens him with death if he tells somebody, and he goes and tells anyway. And now > Iran has the audacity to threaten the United States and other western > nations with unconventional warfare tactics, terrorism, If they are prevented > forcibly from implementing their scheme. Iran has never needed a nuclear weapon > for protection. The Mullahs of Iran should have taken a lesson from Kaddhaffi > and left well enough alone. But I believe they are counting on political > resistance from Democrats to prevent Bush from using any force to stop them from > developing their goal. It ain't just the Democrats, honey bunch. Again the above paragraphs tie the dangers of State > sponsored terrorism and WMD's, something Iran was not guilty of. Now that they > are intent on having both, state sponsored terrorism and WMD's, they put > themselves at risk for regime change.. > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
