--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On May 21, 2006, at 4:12 AM, sparaig wrote:
> >
> > > --- In [email protected], Jason Spock <jedi_spock@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >       I beg your pardon.  I don't get it.
> > > >
> > > >       What I meant was did Dr. Domash was the first to put 
> > > forward the Unified field
> > > theory of consciousness or was it Dr. Hagelin's brain-wave.??
> > >
> > > Domash, IIRC, suggested that the Maharishi Effect might have an
> N-
> > > squared version, but
> > > he didn't buy into MMY's ideas about Quantum Mechanics.
> >
> > Neither did Hagelin till he was told "make it work, or you're out
> of 
> > here". Interesting 'cause it may give an essential insight into
> how 
> > TM research is fudged: make it work or else you're out of here.
> The 
> > Furher Mahesh effect.
> >
> > Knowing this, how could anyone take TM research seriously?
> >
>
>
> Quantum mechanics, Unified State and Consciousness...this was all,
> as far as I could tell, analogy.
>
> And I suppose analogy is fine when it comes to helping one
> understand complex and abstract ideas, which Physics is full of. For
> example, we've often heard the analogy of the two twins that leave
> Earth at the same time in two separate spacecrafts, one travelling
> at the speed of light and the other at a lesser speed and one comes
> back older than the other.
>
> But I could never tell where the line was with MMY: was this all
> just an analogy or was it describing the reality?
>

It's not an anology for MMY or Hagelin either. Perhaps it was for Domash. Maybe that's
what I had in mind when I said he didn't buy the Consciousness = QM thing.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to