--- In [email protected], "matrixmonitor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Q's lesson: think twice before messing with the past. an > alternative past may turn out worse than the "real" past.
It's occurred to me to wonder (fancifully) whether the fact that we never seem to be able to nail down the details of what actually happened in major catastrophes--there always seem to be masses of contradictory evidence, leading to all kinds of conspiracy theories--is a function of people from various times in the future coming back to try to alter the events in different ways in an attempt to make their futures turn out better. In other words, no such major event happened *just one way*, but rather several different ways, all superimposed on each other, all with different details. It would make a good science fiction story, at any rate! ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lik1AB/fOaOAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
