--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> ME: > So all that is left is the
> > claim that they somehow scrubbed out all the hopping artifacts. I
> > believe that they just pasted in a period of coherence and that
> > the whole chart is a fraud. I am opened to being shown how I am 
> > wrong about this.
> 
> Judy: And how would we be able to prove this negative,
> Curtis? (As a devotee of logic, you *do* know
> about the impossibility of proving a negative,
> right?)
> 
> I am not asking them to prove a negative.  I am inviting anyone to
> prove me wrong about my claim that this chart is totally made-up.
> The 10 minutes of coherence during flying is phony. Someone who 
> knows how they got 10 minutes of clean flying data can prove me 
> wrong.

Well, yes, of course you're asking to prove a negative,
i.e., that the EEG coherence data is not a fraud.

You're making the claim that it's a fraud; you're the
one who needs to prove that's the case.  It isn't up
to somebody else to prove it's *not* the case.

And you need to make up your mind about whether you're
claiming the chart is "totally" made up, or just those
10 minutes.

As to the 10 minutes, O-J did explain: "The other
thing we have done when there was hoping was to take
out all epochs with artifacts. We still see elevated
alpha and coherence with artifact removed."

If you think that's bogus, it's up to you to show
why.

You could always grill O-J himself, you know.  There
are several people here who have his email address;
I'm sure they'll send it to you privately if you ask,
or at least forward your questions to him.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to