--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Second, of course, "anti-TMer" is an entirely > legitimate label for those who, like Barry and Vaj > and Curtis, routinely attack the TMO, MMY, and TMers > (individually or as a group)." > > Since I have been on this group I have heard far more criticism > coming from others, some of whom practice TM.
Certainly you, Vaj, and Barry aren't the only ones criticizing TM, but that's not what I suggested. Notice that I said "those who, *like* Barry and Vaj and Curtis..." > Other than responding to things others have put up I have not > initiated any criticisms of TM. I had in mind your stint on alt.m.t some years ago, as well as your participation in recent discussions here. As far as I can tell, your attitude and approach haven't changed a bit since alt.m.t. Nor did I stipulate that I was speaking only about those who *initiate* criticisms. > This designation of "anti-Tmer" is a stupid label in a group where > most of the posters couldn't get into the dome. But it doesn't mean just not being able to get into the dome. It's a particular type of driven, vicious, and unremitting criticism, frequently unencumbered by facts or fairness. > If you really cared about the movement Ah, but I don't care about the movement. I think it sucks, as I've said many, many times. > you would encourage them to correct stupid > misleading charts instead of defending their stupid misleading > charts. You make the same "mistake" Barry does. I'm critizing the anti-TMers' lack of fairness and accuracy. I'm criticizing what I see as their lack of integrity. Any "defense" of the TMO is just a side effect, not my main motivation. I will "defend" people and perspectives I strongly disagree with if I feel they're being attacked unfairly or inaccurately, just because it's the right thing to do. Obviously that isn't your approach. > > But in my world none of that matters. No one is looking at TM charts. > For the rest of the world they are so far into the silly zone that > all our analysis is absurd. So the question becomes "If a fraudulent > claim is made in the woods and no one hears it..." To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
