--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i posted this original post as a joke. But with a serious point. > Something Barry touched on earlier. We take target or desired > physiological parameters as a given -- with scant justification -- > though admittedly often with basic common sense. > > Just because brain waves become coherent, or "low-S values" seem like > a good thing, how do we know without really digging into the research > literature. Epileptics have coherent brain wave patterns, and > neurotically disturbed patients have low S-values. So why should > coherent brain waves and low S-values, or any physiological value > necessarily be "good", always, on an a priori basis. ? And "good for > everyone"? >
The kind of EEG coherence found during TM is most obviously found in people who report periods of transcendence during TM. IS this a good thing, or a bad thing, or just a thing? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
