--- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" > > <marwincornyarmand@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" > > > <marwincornyarmand@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > MMY used the words My Technique, My Vedic Science - My - My - > > > > > > My - long before that. > > > > > Maybe TM is MMY techniques and has nothing to do with Guru > Devs > > > > > teaching - and that MMY has mislead all TM-Teachers and all > > > > > meditators about that fact. That he has used Guru Dev as an > > > > > Alibi for good and bad? > > > > > Ingegerd > > > > > > > > MMY has made it clear from the start that TM is his baby, > > > > *based* on Gurudev's teachings. Did you somehow miss this, as > > > > presented in SOBAL and the Gita commentaries? > > > > > > > I am a bit sceptical about what MMY says and has written these > > > days > > > > You mean, you think he lied in SBAL and the Gita > > commentary, and TM was really *Guru Dev*'s technique? > > > > But wait, you said above "Maybe TM is MMY techniques... > > and that MMY has mislead all TM-Teachers and all > > meditators about that fact." > > > > Which is it? > > I think MMY made the commentary in the Gita from his point of view, > from his consciousness -. I have read other commentaries, that > struck me is from a more "enlightened" view. I used to accept every > word that came from MMYs lips as the ultimate truth - I do not do > that any more. As a TM-Teacher we were told to say to the > Meditators that TM is an very old technique, which comes from the > chankarycharia tradition and MMY received that technique from Guru > Dev. I doubt it. I think that MMY made his own technique
I guess I didn't make myself clear. Your original statement and your response to Lawson seemed to be contradictory. Your original statement doubted that TM came from Guru Dev; when Lawson told you MMY has said from the beginning that he had devised the technique, and that he says this in SBAL and his Gita commentary, you said you didn't trust what he's written, implying that he *didn't* devise the technique. - but most TM- > Teachers truly believe that the techniques comes from Guru Dev. Actually, the introductory essay by Larry Domash to the first volume of the Collected Papers makes it very clear that the technique comes from MMY, albeit the knowledge that made devising the technique possible came from Guru Dev. And this essay was certainly approved by MMY. What MMY says is that he *revived* the technique, that it had been lost. Domash says MMY figured out, on the basis of his experience of Guru Dev's teaching and study of the ancient texts, what the original technique *must have been*. I've never heard anything other than that. I never heard that Guru Dev himself gave MMY the technique. > Sorry - but I have doubts in MMY. > Ingegerd > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
