--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" > <marwincornyarmand@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" > > > <marwincornyarmand@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" > > > > <marwincornyarmand@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > MMY used the words My Technique, My Vedic Science - My - > My - > > > > > > > > My - long before that. > > > > > > Maybe TM is MMY techniques and has nothing to do with Guru > > Devs > > > > > > teaching - and that MMY has mislead all TM-Teachers and all > > > > > > meditators about that fact. That he has used Guru Dev as an > > > > > > Alibi for good and bad? > > > > > > Ingegerd > > > > > > > > > > MMY has made it clear from the start that TM is his baby, > > > > > *based* on Gurudev's teachings. Did you somehow miss this, as > > > > > presented in SOBAL and the Gita commentaries? > > > > > > > > > I am a bit sceptical about what MMY says and has written these > > > > days > > > > > > You mean, you think he lied in SBAL and the Gita > > > commentary, and TM was really *Guru Dev*'s technique? > > > > > > But wait, you said above "Maybe TM is MMY techniques... > > > and that MMY has mislead all TM-Teachers and all > > > meditators about that fact." > > > > > > Which is it? > > > > I think MMY made the commentary in the Gita from his point of view, > > from his consciousness -. I have read other commentaries, that > > struck me is from a more "enlightened" view. I used to accept every > > word that came from MMYs lips as the ultimate truth - I do not do > > that any more. As a TM-Teacher we were told to say to the > > Meditators that TM is an very old technique, which comes from the > > chankarycharia tradition and MMY received that technique from Guru > > Dev. I doubt it. I think that MMY made his own technique > > I guess I didn't make myself clear. Your original > statement and your response to Lawson seemed to be > contradictory. Your original statement doubted that > TM came from Guru Dev; when Lawson told you MMY has > said from the beginning that he had devised the > technique, and that he says this in SBAL and his Gita > commentary, you said you didn't trust what he's > written, implying that he *didn't* devise the > technique. > > - but most TM- > > Teachers truly believe that the techniques comes from Guru Dev. > > Actually, the introductory essay by Larry Domash > to the first volume of the Collected Papers makes > it very clear that the technique comes from MMY, > albeit the knowledge that made devising the > technique possible came from Guru Dev. And this > essay was certainly approved by MMY. > > What MMY says is that he *revived* the technique, > that it had been lost. Domash says MMY figured > out, on the basis of his experience of Guru Dev's > teaching and study of the ancient texts, what > the original technique *must have been*. > > I've never heard anything other than that. I never > heard that Guru Dev himself gave MMY the technique.
If you are a TM-Teacher - think about what you are saying in the steps before you do the Puja. Ingegerd > > > > > Sorry - but I have doubts in MMY. > > Ingegerd > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
