--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone know Peter Klutz personally? He's engaging in non-stop vandalism on > wikipedia. >
I do (I think). Before the propaganda by wikipeda et al makes you fully brainwashed, here'sa recap followed by some assorted comments: (1) PK started out like he supposed most other people start with making contributions at WP, with the innocent joy of creating something only a newbie can muster. He was immediatelly attacked by numerous accounts accusing him of vandalism and violations of whatever "rules" exist at wikipedia. It would take PK a month or so to realize that he had skipped right into a carefully moulded minefield. Because this is what WP apparently has petrified into: controversial articles have been appropriated by clicques of people who scream bloody murder and throw the V word at anyone who thinks he or she can contribute, whilst ingratiating themselves with admins. True to his nature (but unfortunatelly still too innocent for this world) PK became pissed off at these attacks and held his ground. His greatest mistake, however, was to take the allegations against TM and MMY at face value and investigate the sources. When this was done - and it was apparent that the TM and MMY articels have been kidnapped by entities dedicatedly hostile to TM etc - he said so. The rest, as it is said, is history. (2) Instead of caving in to the constant barrage of allegations against PK, sparaig, take a couple of steps back and review the situation. Here are a few suggestions: a. compare Mr Skolnicks interpretation of wikipedia rules with the rules themselves. When you do this, you're actually going to learn that what S is trying to portray as rules are in fact more like guidelines - guidelines found on pages that can actually be edited and thus changed by anyone. Perhaps more surprisingly, you will also come across the word "bold", which is how Mr Jimbo Wales, want's your contributions to be like (and there's a backdrop to my questions to Bishonento what'sgone wrong with WP - duly deleted by S). b. compare PK's NPA violations with S violations or even those of some of the admins. c. PK's view on what's going on at WP is that it is a social experiement gone terrbiely wrong: S and his admins has rapidly formed a secterian-minded group based on hate toward outsiders (in this case people they label TMers) where relations are now so tight that S feel comfortable enough to publicly joke about his gratitude of the admins at WP for their willingess to enroll in S's personal axis of evil of Jewish-Christian fundamentalism. PK's take on the situation is that the phenomenon is akin to how people a few hundred years ago worked up a frenzy in order to be able to torch witches at the stake. I say this half-jokiugly, but the discrepancy between PK's contributions per se and how they are described by S adn assorted WP admins has to be seen to be believed. So has the bile produced at WP over it all. d. Finally, how many people actually read the TM and MMY articles at WP? I'd be surprised if anyone outside a circle made up of yourself, Bishonen and other WP admins - and S - do this. "Never mind the mosquitoues - shoot the tiger." Why engage in pointless communications with the mosquitoes of this world, when you can go to DC or FF? PK ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
