--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure Doug. As a start, loose the crowns and robes (it didn't
> work the first time, historically), stop suing or trying to re-
> certify
> the teachers. Start teaching TM for an honest price.... Stop hiding
> all the finances. Stop trying to accumulate property by any means. 
> The
> TMO has lost the good will of so many and become untrustworthy....
> 
> JohnY
> 
> 
> Yes, these things in time would be helpful and nothing will happen 
> unless they are done.  Transparency keeps coming up at the problem.  
> The first thing the accreditation team recently coached the 
> Maharishi School for the Age of Enlightenment to do was to audit all 
> parts of the school and report the audit to everyone.  When hell 
> freezes over is likely what the administrators and MMY think of 
> course.
> 
> The great quote recently is MMY to one of Mother Olsen's daughter's 
> who was advising that the fees for  basic meditation should be 
> reduced,  MMY's response accurately was, "Don't tell me how to run 
> my business"  Last contact and lost contact in that.
> 
> As Hagelin said succinctly in a public meeting with TSR here, we got 
> the best movement and the best guidelines we got now.  Nothing is 
> going to change evidently until after MMY.  Wait until then for the 
> best hope in all of this.
> 
> Does that mean that MMY can't die fast enough to git out of the 
> way?  It is a sad deal for something that was so hopeful.
> 
> Jai Guru Dev,
> 
> -Doug in FF
> 

Doug do you have any more detail about this:
"The great quote recently is MMY to one of Mother Olsen's daughter's
who was advising that the fees for basic meditation should be
reduced, MMY's response accurately was, "Don't tell me how to run
my business" Last contact and lost contact in that."

Especially "Last contact and lost contact in that." Do you mean that
she left and had no more contact with Maharishi? 


Thanks, 

JohnY







> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <jyouells@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5"
> > <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Reconciling the past,
> > > 
> > > >how likely is it that
> > > > they'd
> > > > > > be open to the rest of us? (Not that there'd even be that 
> many
> > > > willing
> > > > > > to go.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sal
> > > 
> > > 
> > > JohnY writes,
> > > The quaility of the current programs speak to both Maharishi's 
> and 
> > > the
> > > TMO's openness. That's why the participation is as it is. 27,000
> > > siddha's ... less than 2000 participating.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Doug writing:
> > > Yes, round numbers a million TM meditators taught in the US,  
> with 
> > > some tens of thousands of TM teachers taught, some tens of 
> thousands 
> > > people taught the TM0-sidhis; and a few hundreds show up when 
> > > called. 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/104974
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Reconciling the numbers, what would the TMOrg need do, to 
> reconcile 
> > > with its people?  It had got pretty ugly in recent years, what 
> could 
> > > the elements of a lasting peace and reconciliation for the TMorg 
> be 
> > > with its meditators? 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Jai Guru Dev,
> > > -Doug in FF
> > > 
> >   I'm not sure Doug. As a start, loose the crowns and robes (it 
> didn't
> > work the first time, historically), stop suing or trying to 
> recertify
> > the teachers. Start teaching TM for an honest price.... Stop hiding
> > all the finances. Stop trying to accumulate property by any means. 
> The
> > TMO  has lost the good will of so many and become 
> untrustworthy.... 
> > 
> > JohnY
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <jyouells@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel" 
> <babajii_99@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" 
> <jyouells@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine 
> > > <salsunshine@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But most sidhas here are or were doing other stuff.  And 
> > > seeing 
> > > > > as how 
> > > > > > > someone else just got thrown out for that, how likely is 
> it 
> > > that 
> > > > > they'd 
> > > > > > > be open to the rest of us? (Not that there'd even be 
> that 
> > > many 
> > > > > willing 
> > > > > > > to go.)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Sal
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > How likely is it that Maharishi would be open about it? 
> Why 
> > > even
> > > > > > bother to ask? 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > JohnY 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well, you might be surprised by his answer;
> > > > > If you never ask, you'll never know...
> > > > > The Baghavad Gita states this, in: "Action is always 
> superior to 
> > > > > inaction", because at least you get an answer...
> > > > > Didn't Maharishi hang out with some 'Heavy Dudes', in India?
> > > > > Didn't he hang with people like, Tat Wala Baba?
> > > > > Would Tat Wala Baba, be allowed in the Dome?
> > > > > So, I wouldn't be surprised, if someone would only ask...
> > > > > That has been the problem; there have been such controlling;
> > > > > People around Maharishi, that they intimidate;
> > > > > Even the asking of a perfectly relevant question:
> > > > > Very Sad!!!
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > The quaility of the current programs speak to both Maharishi's 
> and 
> > > the
> > > > TMO's openness. That's why the participation is as it is. 
> 27,000
> > > > siddha's ... less than 2000 participating. That's actually 
> more 
> > > than I
> > > > expected....
> > > > 
> > > > JohnY
> > > >
> > > ,
> > >
> >
>






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to