--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/11/06 11:18:28 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Ban anything that can be used to determine the sex of the fetus. > > Ultrasound while the > > > mom isn't allowed to look, would be OK, as long as the doctor > > doesn't reveal the sex. > > > > Hey, that might actually work. > > > > What about the mothers right to know? > > What about it? > > > > > Now could you imagine that being said to a prospective mother in the USA? > For all the doctor knows, she's coming in for a routine check up and wants to > know the sex of her child. She doesn't have to make a decision to abort before > she knows all the facts.
If abortion wasn't "killing", no one would give a rat's ass about whether or not they knew the sex of the fetus. This whole discussion exposes the extreme discomfort various parties to this debate have when the same so-called freedom to choose is provided within another context: the right to know the sex of your fetus should be no less a right than the right to reproductive freedom. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
