--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: <snip> > > > > Malnak v Yogi. The case was concerning TM+SCI+puja. TM, by > > > > itself, was never analysed seaprately from the theoretical > > > > course taught along with it. > > > > > > It raises issues for the Lynch Foundation -- particularly if a > > > whole school signs up. And its a public school. But no public > > > funds are used. Does the court ruling set a precedent that > > > would effect that? > > > > No, the court ruling had to do only with the use > > of public funds, of course (the "establishment" > > clause of the First Amendment). As long as the > > gummint ain't paying for it, it has nothing to > > say. > > And the teaching of TM/SCI during classtime and the requirement > that everyone attend a puja, etc.
Right, the use of government funds for any of these things. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
