--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > <snip> > > Here's the nutshell ruling. I bought the entire ruling last night. > > Andrew is very unhappy with me for continuing to disagree with him > > on this issue, BTW. He doesn't see a difference > > between "TM" and "SCI/TM" as put forth in the ruling. The relevant > > part of the ruling: > > Did you show him the appeals court ruling, with the > concurring opinion of Judge Adams? Adams's opinion > goes into more detail on this point. > > That opinion is really fascinating; it's a mini-course > in First Amendment law pertaining to religion, > beautifully reasoned and very clearly written, not at > all technical for the layperson. > > Maybe I should upload it to the Files section. >
It's interesting, but not relevant in most lawyer's minds, I think. The Malnak test was divised by Meanor, not Adams, and THAT is what is cited in case law. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
