--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > wrote: > > > > Ken, all your silly rantings are going to accomplish is to show people > > how lucky they are *not* to be in the Domes...and castigating people > > for standing on principle by refusing to apply when others are still > > being rejected, shows an almost incredible lack of basic integrity. > > > > Get a life. > > > > Sal > > Hi Sal, > > Over time, I have enjoyed your posts, common sense, and sly wit. > > > people [who] stand[ing] on principle by refusing to apply when > others are still > > being rejected > > I am curious about your comment [slightly edited to hone in on the > point I am interested in]. Are many people being rejected currently? > Shivama seems to be quite an exceptions, perhaps a reasonable one, to > the general "rule' -- that is my impression that all but the most > blatant are being accepted. > > For example Rory has been and is in the domes. Perhaps he was posting > here before your time -- I don't recall your "entrance" [slinky black > cocktail dress, right? :) ]. > > Rory has been accepted and per Rick, is attending the Domes. While > Rory is an engaging, interesting and charming guy, I like him, he is > hardly what one would call TMO mainstream. > > For example, he has a website that postulates or claims realization -- > depending on which day you ask him :) 16 or 32 or some large number > of states of enlightenement -- most beyond (the apparently MMY/TMO) > BC. And he has expounded on, done, dabbled, or seriously pursued many > different techniques and teaqches, AFAIR. Including some sort of > mediumship according to his website -- and former wife (who used to > post here also -- Vashti). He also used to run a esoteric book shop, > and gave classes on many esoteric topics. Apparently when he was in > FF, he had a "following". All good and fine things in my book. But not > your typical TMO TBer. > > So if Rory is being accepted, then the bar seems pretty low
I've never understood the anaology of "the bar". If it is a limbo bar, then the expression would have to be "the bar seems pretty high", not "low" because if it was a low limbo bar, almost no one would be able to pass under it. If it's "high" then almost anyone can pass under. So if the analogy doesn't refer to a limbo bar, what is it referring to? Sheltered and sequestered my whole life, I remain...Shemp McGurk. > for those > with quite wide, non-TMO, spiritual topics and practices. > > Rick said Tom Traynor has also been accepted. Tom appears to also have > have wide ranging, beyond TMO, pursuits and practices. And heads a > weekly satsang in FF for the "enlightened". > > Again, not your standard TMO TBer. > > So I value your, on the ground, insights from the "front". It appears > to me, most all are being accepted to the domes. Is your observation > there in FF different? Right now? (not 3-4 weeks ago). > > Thanks. > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
