--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 27, 2006, at 10:42 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > Let's take another example. > > > > Suppose somebody says they don't think MMY is a > > male chauvinist. > > > > And I respond, "Well, he does say women should > > stay at home and raise the children." > > > > Would you assume I *believed* women should stay > > at home and raise the children? > > > No. But what you and the others (pro-TMers) have been saying all along > is, "Well, he does say women should stay home and raise the children, > but that doesn't necessarily make him a male chauvinist." > > See the difference? :)
Except, what you clipped was Judy's explanation that she DOES believe that MMY ***IS*** a male chauvinist, so, you've presented us with two most-plausible scenarios: you don't really read what Judy writes, but only those parts that seem to verify what you already believe, OR you DID read what Judy wrote, and carefully snipt the context since it would have obviated the point you were trying to make by quoting her. BTW, how does an October wedding sound? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
