Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The big WHY

[Rick Archer]

Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The big WHY





on 9/7/06 9:47 AM, Sal Sunshine at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Sep 7, 2006, at 9:17 AM, authfriend wrote:
> 
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> 
>> , Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> I first noticed something odd when even counseling was given
>>> a bum rap, and they started to ask questions about if you'd ever
>>> had any.  Seemed very personal and none of their business.
>> 
>> On the other hand, the TMO has been criticized
>> for not being more careful in its screening
>> procedures.  Seems to me requiring one's therapist's
>> written permission to learn TM was a sensible
>> precaution, a step in the right direction, at least.
> 
> I never heard about the "requiring one's therapist's permission" thing, 

It used to be that if you were in an intense therapeutic relationship (I forget the frequency) you couldn’t get initiated at all, but if you were seeing a therapist less frequently, you could get initiated but needed a letter from the therapist stating that he understood what you were doing and promising not to pry into confidential aspects of the teaching during therapy.

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



      
      Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
      Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
      Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
           
        Visit Your Group 
       |
      
        Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
       |
      
       Unsubscribe 
       
 
    
  




__,_._,___