--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
> <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > > The last sentence above describes genuine censorship.
> > > > 
> > > > ...as opposed to what you stand for: discouraging the free 
> > > > dissemination of and free exchange of ideas...
> > > 
> > > I'm discouraging the dissemination without rebuttal
> > > on national television of documented falsehoods
> > > concerning the lead-up to 9/11.
> > 
> > Before you backpedaled and settled for "with
> > rebuttal,"
> 
> Wasn't a backpedal, and not only was it not
> something I "settled for," it was, as far as
> I'm concerned, a *far better solution*.
> 
>  you were *encouraging* taking the
> > film off the air so that it could not be seen
> > until *after* the upcoming elections. In my
> > book, that is censorship, the attempt to 
> > control ACCESS to material you don't want 
> > the public to see.
> 
> No, in the first place, as I've explained (and
> MDixon has confirmed), censorship is when the
> authorities *force* somebody to remove content.
> Not only am I not advocating censorship, I would
> fight tooth and nail against it.  It's
> unconstitutional.
> 
> To encourage ABC to choose to do the right thing
> in the interests of fairness is not "censorship"
> in any way, shape, or form.
> 
> And I'd be *thrilled* if the public were to see
> it along with a rebuttal.
> 
> > You didn't like it, so in your mind yanking 
> > it off the air for blatantly political purposes 
> > was OK.
> 
> If ABC chose to do that, yes, of course it would
> be OK.  ABC has the right to consider various
> points of view and make its own decisions as to
> what it should do.
> 
> My point of view is that choosing to run it
> unedited, as scheduled, with a rebuttal would
> be the best solution.
> 
> > You're a hypocrite.
> 
> You're the hypocrite here, obviously.
>


I told you, Barry, that she would now devote 1,000s of words to 
explain why she didn't say what she said.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to